Saturday, 19 March 2011

OTCBB.COM: DIRECT FILING IPO VS. REVERSE MERGER

Direct Filing IPO vs. Reverse Merger
Which method is right for you?

IPO Method Comparison for the OTCBB:

When deciding whether go public via direct filings or via reverse merger with an OTCBB public shell company, here are some things to consider:

COST: Going Public by reverse merger with a trading OTCBB public shell company is much more expensive. The cost to conduct a reverse merger, including the legal fees and public shell cost is anywhere from $350,000 to more than $500,000 USD. In comparison, the cost to go public by direct filings is typically under $50,000 (USD).

TIME: Going Public by reverse merger with a trading OTCBB public shell company is much faster than going public direct. The time it takes to complete a reverse merger is only a few weeks, whereas to go public on the OTCBB direct typically takes approximately 6 months from the date your audit is completed. 

FINANCIAL AUDIT: Whether you go public by reverse merger with a public shell or direct filings, the OTCBB requires that your financials be audited before the filing or merger and then yearly by a PCAOB registered CPA firm. 

SHAREHOLDERS: To be a publicly traded company, you need a minimum of approximately 35 shareholders. If your company does not already have 35 shareholders, you must do a private offering for the purpose of amassing those shareholders, which can be quite a hassle. When you go public by reverse merger with an OTCBB public shell company, the OTCBB shell company already has the required number of shareholders.

POTENTIAL CONTINGENT LIABILITIES:  when you go public by reverse merger with a public shell company, there is the potential that you acquire problems associated with the OTCBB shell's 'former life'. When you go public direct, you have a perfectly clean, new public shell company. 

So as you can see, going public by reverse merger is much faster and the company going public doesn't have to worry about obtaining shareholders, but is approximately 6 times the cost as going public direct. 


No comments:

Post a Comment